Refuting Ahmadiyya with Ahmadiyya writings–in terms of the insults MGA wrote about Jesus
Recently, an Ahmadi Murrabi on Facebook has published a response to the disrespectful statements of MGA versus the Christian Missionaries. His article is filled with Academic dishonesty.
This Murrabi never quotes the Quran or hadith in terms of what should be the behavior of a Muslim towards the gods of other religions. Including Christianity…
Firstly, Allah tells us in the Quran, Chapter 6, Verse 108, (109 in Qadiani Qurans): “And revile not those whom they call upon beside Allah, lest they, out of spite, revile Allah in their ignorance. Thus unto every people have We caused their doing to seem fair. Then unto their Lord is their return; and He will inform them of what they used to do.” http://www.alislam.org/quran/search2/showChapter.php?submitCh=Read+from+verse%3A&ch=6&verse=107
In fact, in the official 5 volume commentary on alislam.org, Malik Ghulam Fareed has written on page 729:
“In the forgoing verses, the Quran has spoken rather contemptuously of the utter helplessness of the false deities whom people associate with God. This might lead some Muslims to revile the false deities of the polytheists; the present verse warns them against following such a course. God has denounced the idols in his capacity as a judge, and the denunciation of a judge is not considered as abuse, but as a necessary expression of opinion. This does not give others the right to abuse the persons condemned by the Heavenly judge and thereby offend their feelings, or the feelings of those who love and respect them.
“The verse provides yet another reason for this noble teaching. It purports to say, “If you, O Muslims, revile disbelievers’ false Gods whom they treat with love and reverence, the result will be that they will be excited by your abuse and will retaliate by reviling God in return. The verse thus not only inculcates respect for the feelings of others but also assures amity between nations and communities.”
See—http://www.alislam.org/quran/tafseer/?page=729®ion=E1
Moving on….this Murrabi quotes Islamic clerics from that same era, however, he considers these people as the worst creatures in the world? Does that make MGA also one of the worst Mullahs ever?
And where did MGA get these insults from?? So we know that he never wrote anything original. He always stole writings and arguments. Research work tells us that Hindus were the ones using these same insults towards Jesus Christ. And MGA appears to have stolen their writings and arguments and passed them off as his own.
Dyananda wrote a book called “Satyarth Prakash” in 1875. Van Der Linden describes this as such:
“…while Christianity and Islam have a long history of disputations, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad not only used many of the arguments against Christianity as put forward by Dayanand Saraswati in the Satyarth Prakash…..”
From “Moral Languages from Colonial Punjab” by Bob Van Der Linden
Page 183
Dyananda also wrote that Jesus Christ of the Bible was an adulterer and spoke ill of his own mother.
In the referencing section of Chapter 5. Under reference number 19. Page 217
19 . He (Lekh Ram) published “Christian Mat Darpam” in the same year as “The Epistle of Jihad”. In it, Lekh ram argued that Christ was not sinless but, on the contrary a cruel illiterate drunkard, liar and thief who insulted his mother. In selections, 1897, Nur Afshan, 14 May p. 387.
Conclusion: The “Epistle of Jihad” by Lekh Ram was published in 1892. He wrote another book the same year wherein he attacked Christianity, i.e. Christian Mat Darpam. Lekh Ram called Jesus of the Bible all of those foul things in 1892.
MGA used the same arguments as he slandered Jesus Christ of the Bible during his tirade on Christianity.
Finally, MGA broke Islamic rules and stole Arya Samaj polemics and has his tirade against Jesus. And nowadays…Ahmadis are trying to defend him? So sad.
Bobby Muhammad
Another Brother Leaves Ahmadiyya
http://www.islamafterahmadiyya.com/blog/read_122673/another-brother-leaves-ahmadiyya.html
Our dear brother, Khalid Jamal Ahmad, has left the Ahmadiyya organisation after careful and thorough research of Mirza Ghulam’s writings and beliefs. With his permission, below is a copy of his Letter of Renunciation.
One more brave and well educated sister leaves Ahmadiyya
Dear Readers
You will read a copy of my letter dated 24 October 2014 about leaving Ahmadiyya religion attach to this. As you read it, you will see that I explained very clearly to leave me alone. We are still receiving the literature and phone calls to attend the forthcoming meetings!! It forces me to go public with this information as your organisation or (disorganisation) will not take a BLIND BIT OF NOTICE.
I trust Allah Almighty who has guided me. He only is the Judge of all. This is a brief account from me. There is no compulsion in religion.
Continue reading One more brave and well educated sister leaves Ahmadiyya
Comparative Religions : Qadianism ; Introduction to Bahaism – Sayyed Muhammad Rizvi
Leaving Ahmadiyya, A Female Perspective by Sister Liberated
From: http://www.islamafterahmadiyya.com/blog/read_121315/leaving-ahmadiyya-a-female-perspective.html
Leaving the Ahmadiyya belief and organisation is difficult for anyone but I believe it is even more difficult for a female. The Ahmadiyya organisation is very much patriarchal, in which the woman’s voice is considered much inferior to its male counterpart. Although the organisation has a separate auxiliary organisation for the ladies, women do not have any decision-making power in the main body of the organisation. This patriarchal ethos is embedded in the attitudes of the Ahmadiyya organisation’s members. Furthermore in homes, the female members of the family are considered less than the males (in most families). And considering that the majority of the members of the Ahmadiyya organisation are from the Indian subcontinent, these patriarchal attitudes are prevalent in the majority of the followers.
Continue reading Leaving Ahmadiyya, A Female Perspective by Sister Liberated
New Ahmadiyya Awareness website
Why Ansar Raza (or any other Qadiani missionary) will not debate the character of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
by Sadat bin Anwar, MDI Canada
The controversy in Toronto surrounding the organized/proposed debate between Imam Sheharyar Shaikh (Sunni Muslim) of the North American Muslim Foundation (NAMF) and Ansar Raza, a top Qadiani (Ahmadi) missionary in Canada continues to grow. Raza (pictured above), who had been requesting Shaikh for the past four years for such a debate, is now unwilling to attend the event. The debate topic was set up unilaterally by NAMF as “Mirza Ghulam Ahmed: A Prophet or an Imposter?”
Continue reading Why Ansar Raza (or any other Qadiani missionary) will not debate the character of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
