Wording of The Divine Revelation?

By A.K. Shaikh
The commandment of Allah is: “Jihad (fighting in the cause of Allah) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing, which is actually good for you and that you like a thing, which is actually bad for you. Only Allah has the absolute knowledge but you do not know.” [2:216]

This commandment of Allah is obligatory on every Muslim and is valid for all times – just like none of the commandments of Prayer, Fasting, Hajj and Zakat (obligatory alms) are temporary. There are certain conditions, however, like Hajj will only be performed during the days of Hajj; fasting will be in Ramadan; prayers during prescribed timings and Jihad (Qitaal) [fighting by sword] when it becomes obligatory etc. Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

I would like to share with everyone what Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani, who claimed to be a a second coming of Isa AS, had to say about actual Isa AS. He had to knock him down to claim his superiority over the previous one and also defeat Atham no matter what he had to say.

This is from Rk.vol.19.pg.486 in notes at the bottom.

“because people knew that this person(Isa AS) is a drunker and this unethical character is not after divinity but has been like this since beginning therefore the claim of divinity is a bad result of being a drunker” 

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

I would share some goodies by MGAQ. Afterall Ruhani Khazain are not that Ruhani .This is from Zameemah Baraaheen-e-Ahmadiyya. Part-5. I would translate this according to my english skills, if you could come up with a better one please do.MGAQ is defining the feeling of humility and humbleness and what happens when a person cries in humility.

 

MGAQ goes on to say: and they think that we have met God. but that pleasure is just as if an adulterer has with an unlawful women….(PS. please note he’s defining here about what kind of humility people from bad community feel like people who worship idols and dance on music etc)... next para

“and another symbolic mutuality is of humility and sperm and that is when a Sperm enters in the private-part (vagina) of a wife or any other woman; so sperm’s entering into the vagina and when the ejaculation flowing is just like crying because result of humility is crying too and like this when ejaculation of sperm occurs uncontrolled sperm bursts out in a flow. Same great situation is when in humility when tears burst into a uncontrolled flow from eyes and as the pleasure of ejaculation is halaal kind of whereas a man contacts(rujoo’) his wife and sometimes haraam kind when a man contacts(rujoo’) an unlawful woman”……

I would really like to hear from our Ahmadi friends to give us an insight into this gem from Mirza Sahib. I dont know why MGAQ chose to symbolize a feeling of humility with intercourse but I am pretty sure that there were 1000 better ways of explaining humility and differentiating it with halal or haram humility than what we just came across.

 

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

This strange and different narrative of the “Promised Reformer” comes to us from 1914. This narrative has changed so many times over the years, that it is refreshing to see the perspective a few months after Mirza Mahmud Ahmad acquired the leadership of the Qadiani community.

Also, it belies the reported Qadiani story that he claimed to be the ‘Promised Reformer’ in 1944.  Enjoy:

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

by Rationalist

This article is an attempt to settle the confusion once and for all on this topic. Over the duration of my exodus from the ‘A’ I have engaged with many Ahmadis on the internet as they denied all statements wherein Mirza Ghulam Ahmad called us Kafir. They vehemently deny all of our accusations of Takfeer from the ‘A’. They act like as if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never called us Kafir in any way shape or form. They act as if we are wrongfully accusing them of Takfeer on us. This article is intended to settle the debate once and for all.

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

Mirza Ghulam Ahmed has held a belief and preached as well that Baba Guru Nanak was a muslim. Mirza sahib said that he used to get Quranic revelations and he had this chola with Arabic inscriptions. Rk. Vol.10 pg. 157

But what Mirza sahib failed to do was go through his writings and belief. Sikhs completely deny that Guru Nanak had any influence whatsoever of Muhammad SAW or Islam.

http://www.sikhcoalition.org/Sikhism8.asp

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

This research works just like a mathematics formula, to prove Mirza G.A.Q sahib wrong in his prophecies for Pigott we will take  the case of Dowie. Because the prophecy was ALMOST same for both of them, we can prove one with the other. Eg, if a=b, b=c means a=c.

We will go through a thorough study of Mirza sahib vs. Pigott and Dowie. The reason is because the prophecy for both of them never got fulfilled and innocent Ahmadis have been kept under lies upon lies that both the prophecies were fulfilled, which in reality is completely opposite. Part1 will discuss Dr. Dowie, his death and Part2 will discuss Pigott, his death. Both part contains what the original sources say and what jama’at has told it’s followers.

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

This is a rebuttal to this article by the Respected Waqar Akbar Cheema

Follow-up with references from five great commentators of the Quran (on Urdu site due to Arabic text)

Summary

While Brother Waqar counters the theory of ‘first ijma‘ presented by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, he ultimately agrees with it.  In the process, he probably reads too much into the Ahadith, ignores the built-in context of 3: 144, ignores usage of the phrase ‘qad khalat’ and then reaches a conclusion diametrically opposite to the most logical conclusion (in my humble opinion).

I will address this specific issue at this time, not question the authenticity of the Ahadith, and ignore the host of other issues around Masih Dajjal (Antichrist), Mahdi and Masih ibn Maryam (Jesus).  We have to leave something for later discussions, don’t we? If you have read Brother Waqar’s article, here is a summary of what I will discuss:

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

Alhaji Sulaiman Aderounmu is the founder of an Islamic organisation, “Itaniji sinu esin Islam” in Ibadan. In an interview with the Nigerian Compass, he said:

Is it true that members of Ahmadiyya cannot pray behind an Imam who is not a member of the society?

It is true that the Ahmadists don’t pray behind an Imam who is not a member of their society and because of this, they are not given the privilege of performing the Hajj pilgrimage except they didn’t indicate in the hajj form that they are Ahmadiyya. . . . (continues talking about theology)

What are Islamic clerics doing on the Ahmadiyya’s case?

Even if a mother give birth to twins, they cannot have the same behaviour and Prophet Muhammed said when the world is coming to an end, there will be 71 different Islamic denominations and it is only one that will be His approved denomination because other denominations are founded because of what the Clerics want to eat.

FacebookEmailPrintShare
© 2012 ahmedi.org Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha