The Ahmadiyya Cult, forced to show its face on an international forum — by their own request — tripped and fell over every one of their cult-like beliefs and practices.  Their incredulous devotees are having a hard time digesting some of the hard facts.

Watch the debate here.  Since many people do not know the structure of the Ahmadiyya, we present this Qadiani Ahmadiyya org chart (we use ‘Qadiani’ to differentiate with other Ahmadiyya organisations such as the Lahoris).

For a larger view, click on the image below a couple of times.

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

Basharat Nazir, together with Rafiq Hayat, had come up with a perfect Islamophobic theme for their 2011 Jalsa (convention):

– First, pay for a poll that would prove that Islamophobia was just the media’s fault,

– and then try to show they are working againt Islamophobia, although they are considered by many, including us, to be one of the leading Islamophobe groups who don’t let an opportunity go by. (after this post, the title was changed to ‘their “Islam”‘ from just ‘Islam’.  The URL still shows the old title.  At least there is some shame left.)

– Then Messrs. Rafiq and Basharat themed the same Punjabi Jalsa as Muslims Declare Jihad on Extremism” and then went as far as ‘30,000 Muslims to Stand United in Pledge to Counter Hatemongers

However, man proposes and God disposes!

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

This research works just like a mathematics formula, to prove Mirza G.A.Q sahib wrong in his prophecies for Pigott we will take  the case of Dowie. Because the prophecy was ALMOST same for both of them, we can prove one with the other. Eg, if a=b, b=c means a=c.

We will go through a thorough study of Mirza sahib vs. Pigott and Dowie. The reason is because the prophecy for both of them never got fulfilled and innocent Ahmadis have been kept under lies upon lies that both the prophecies were fulfilled, which in reality is completely opposite. Part1 will discuss Dr. Dowie, his death and Part2 will discuss Pigott, his death. Both part contains what the original sources say and what jama’at has told it’s followers.

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

The Ahmadiyya in Malta conducted a Women’s Day seminar but there was NO Ahmadi woman at the head table, or none that was mentioned as having spoken at the ‘seminar’.  Since the first lady of Malta and the VP of the National Council of Women spoke at the occasion, we wrote to them:

Your Excellency,

It was very nice to see the First Lady of Malta, Catherine Gonzi, Michelle Muscat, wife of Opposition Leader Joseph Muscat and Nadya Anne Mangion, the vice president of the National Council of Women at this seminar.

The rights of women and their celebration are of prime importance to all Muslims.

It was a concern, however, that no Ahmadi lady spoke at the occasion or was seen among the speakers on the table.  If that is the case, it would again highlight our concerns about the Ahmadiyya religion not practicing what it preaches.  Ahmadi women are not allowed to vote in the general organisation of their community, nor allowed to become President or hold any male-only offices within the community.

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

Being outside the Islamic community and not really grasping complicated issues nor approaching them in the proper manner, and going about their cult-like ways, Ahmadiyya hurt Muslim identity everywhere.  Here is the reaction of right-wing Germans to what the Ahmadiyya are doing in Germany:

Way more dangerous than the Salafists who more or less openly proclaim tough Islamic truth are those who trivialize, who throw sand in the eyes of the people. Foremost of all are the Ahmadiyya who blather on about “love for everyone, hate for none,” even though they, like all other Muslims, base their beliefs on Muhammad, the Quran and the Hadiths. However, they pick out a few harmless and often incomplete quotes so that they can fool the people with an appearance of peacefulness.

It is in this activity that they are an an intensive course of propaganda. In Munich, they often spread out in the shopping zone in Munich and on the subway so that they can pass out their flyers and seek out conversations with people. In doing this, they punch just the right buttons of naïve and clueless do-gooders, and for such citizens it is proof enough: Islam really is different than what is shown in the news of the daily horror tales of suicide bombings, terror, killing, discrimination and persecution.

(http://www.pi-news.org/2011/07/ahmadiyya-proselytizing-in-allahs-service/)

In German (with comments): http://www.pi-news.net/2011/07/ahmadiyya-missionierung-im-dienste-allahs/

Here is a video introduction to what the Ahmadiyya think they are doing in Germany:

Ahmadiyya disinformation activity in Germany

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

It’s been few months now that the case proceedings of 1974 National Assembly have been made public after 36 years.

“This must be a very heartening news for the Ahmadiyya jamaat  because according to the claim made by their Khalifa IV, at least half of Pakistan will become immediately Ahmadi if the proceedings are published”. AlRaqeeb

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

(translated from pp.219-221 Majmooa Ishtiharat vol. 1)

 

Viewers will remember that I, due to the pursuit of a religious argument and while asking for a sign and under the order of God and His revelation, published an article about the daughter of a relative, Mirza Ahmad Beg s/o Mirza Gaman Beg: That it is decreed and decided by God that the girl will eventually be married to me, though it may be in her state of virginity, or after being widowed God brings her to me. The detail of all these facts are in the mentioned article.

 

The reason for this current publication is that my son named Sultan Ahmad and who is an assistant Tehsildar in Lahore, and his aunt (wife of father’s elder brother) who thinks of him like her son, are themselves now opposed to this. Taking the whole matter into their own hands, they are of the opinion that on the day of Eid or following it, the girl should be married to someone else. If this opposing action was bing taken by others, I had no desire or need to interfere – it was an order of my God – and He could make it happen with his Grace and Favour. But, the central forces around this action happen to be those whose obedience to me is is obligatory. I repeatedly tried to make Sultan Ahmad understand, and wrote many letters calling on him: “You and your mother should distance themselves from this matter or else I will leave you and you will have no right on me any more.” They did not even reply to my letters and exhibited a complete exasperation towards me. If they had injured me with a sharp sword, I would have endured it, but they have annoyed me very much with religious opposition and the anguish of religious antagonism. They have broken my heart to a degree that I cannot describe and they deliberately wished for my severe humiliation.

 

Sultan Ahmad is guilty of two heinous sins:

 

First, that he desired to oppose the faith of Muhammad (saw) and he desired the attacks of opponents on the religion of Islam, and in his opinion, he has laid this foundation on the hope that I will be pr oven a liar and the faith will be disgraced, and opponents will be victorious. He has not discriminated in striking out with an opponent’s sword. And this foolish person did not understand that God, the All-Powerful and the Protector-of-Honour, is the supporter of this faith and supports me also and he will never let his servant go to waste. If the whole world were to try to destroy me, He would brace me up with His hand of mercy because I am His and He is mine.

 

Second, Sultan Ahmad declared me, his father, to be an absolute nobody and set out to oppose me and then perfected this opposition, in word and in deed. He helped my religious opponents and wholeheartedly accepted the disgrace of Islam.

 

Since he accumulated both types of sins into his soul, he has broken the relation with his God and also with his father; and so did both of his mothers (biological mother and aunt – translator). So, now that they have not kept any relation with me, I do not wish to have any type of relation with them. I am afraid to become sinful if I keep any association with such enemies of the faith. Therefore today, 2 May ’91, through this publication, I want everyone to know that if these people do not drop that idea; and if they do not stop the proposal about the engagement and marriage of the girl that they are furthering with their own hands; and if they do not reject the person that they have proposed for the marriage; and if the marriage takes place with that person – then –

 

From the day of such marriage, I will disown and disinherit Sultan Ahmad, and from the same day, I divorce his mother(MGA’s first wife – translator). And if his brother, Fazal Ahmad (MGA’s other son – translator) , who is married to the niece of Mirza Ahmad Beg (father of the girl), does not divorce his wife on the same day that he hears of the marriage, he too will be disowned and disinherited. None of them will have any right on me after that. And after such marriage, all relations of being relatives, sharing happiness, and of empathy – will be gone, and there will be no sharing in any good, evil, sorrow happiness, weddings and funerals. This is because they themselves broke off relations and were willing to break them. As such, keeping any relation with them now is absolutely sinful and against the honour of faith and an action like duyyoothi – and a believer is not a duyyooth. (could not find the translation or root of this word – translator)

 

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

Ludhiana

2 May 1891

FacebookEmailPrintShare

August 5, 1974

 English Articles  Comments Off
Aug 082004
 

Translated by Akber Choudhry from “Parliament mein Qadiani Shikast” by Allah Wasaya

Proceedings on 5 August 1974 – first session

In this case, written arguments had been presented. A special parliamentary committee consisting of the entire house went into special session on Monday 5 August 1974 at 10 a.m. The Speaker of the National Assembly, Sahibzada Farooq Ali Khan, was presiding:

(examination of the witness, Mirza Nasir starts)

Mirza Nasir: Thinking of Allah as Present and Watching, whatever I say shall be the sincere truth (an evidentiary oath in Urdu – translator)

Attorney-General: Can you please state the details of the background of your family.

Mirza Nasir: I would like to request some time for this. I will present it to you in written form tomorrow.

Attorney-General: That’s all right, but are you the paternal grandson of Mirza Qadiani?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, the son of his son.

Attorney-General: Please introduce yourself.

Mirza Nasir: I was told that I was born on 16 November 1909.

Mian Gul Aurangzeb: Sound is not carrying . . .

Chairman: Please set the microphone and volume.

Mirza Nasir: I was born on 16 November 1909. I believe there is a little bit of discrepancy in my high school records. I finished high school in 193, B.A. In 1934, and then I went abroad. I did my PhD. In 1938. From 1944 to 1965, I was the principal of Talimul Islam College in Qadian and Rabwah. In November 1965, the Ahmadiyya Jama’at (community – but will not be translated for clarity of proceedings) elected me to be their Imam.

Attorney-General: Are you the successor to Mirza Qadiani?

Mirza Nasir: Yes.

Attorney-General: Are you also the Amir-ul-Mu’mineen (commander of the faithful – an Islamic term for temporal and spiritual supremacy – used for whoever commanded or will command most of the Muslim nation)

Mirza Nasir: Yes, that term is also used about me.

Attorney-General: And also Imam, Khalifatul-Muslimeen (Caliph of the Muslims), Khalifatul Masih (Caliph or Successor to the Messiah), Amir-ul-Mu’mineen. Are these all offices of your highness?

Mirza Nasir: People come and address me as such. In reality I am Khalifatul Masih al-Thalith (third successor to the Promised Messiah).

Attorney-General: Can different individuals hold the three offices independently?

Mirza Nasir: No. One person occupies all three offices.

Attorney-General: What do you mean by Ahmadiyya Jama’at?

Mirza Nasir: Members of the Ahmadiyya Jama’at are those who have pledged allegiance to the third Caliphate. There may be other Ahmadis who do not pledge such allegiance but we do not consider them included in Ahmadiyya Jama’at.

Attorney-General: By the phrase “those who do not pledge allegiance”, do you mean the Lahori group?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, but they are not included in us.

Attorney-General: In other words, they are not members of the Ahmadiyya Jama’at.

Mirza Nasir: Yes, they are not members of the Ahmadiyya Jama’at which is also known as the Mubai’een (those who pledged allegiance).

Attorney-General: What is the total number of individuals from the body of your Jama’at who elect the Imam or Khalifa?

Mirza Nasir: I do not know of the exact number. It includes various groups: Office-bearers of the Jama’at organization; those who have pledged life-long service; district-level office-bearers; those who entered the Ahmadiyya Jama’at or Movement during the life of Mirza Sahib and are living. All of these are permanent members. There was an article on this in the Al-Fazl newspaper. I will send you a copy of it.

Attorney-General: Thank you. But, can only these individuals from the whole Jama’at vote in this election?

Mirza Nasir: No. For example, we have more than one hundred jama’ats in the Lyallpur district (present-day Faisalabad). They all have one Amir, who is the representative of that district.

Attorney-General: But what about those from the period of Mirza?

Mirza Nasir: It is due to the sacrifices of those who pledged allegiance during the time of the founder of the movement and out of respect for their status as elders – they are not elected – but are continuing from past times.

Attorney-General: Are members of the family of Mirza Qadiani members of this electoral committee without any due right, or is it their right because they are members of Mirza’s family?

Mirza Nasir: People do not understand the meaning of “family”. I am a weak person and I hope that I should be able to make you understand. What was meant by “family” were his three sons, and they have all died.

Attorney-General: Now the sons of his sons. This is a good principle – if not sons, then their sons can be present?

Mirza Nasir: No. No. No-one. If they participate, it is out of right. See, “family” means the three sons, and no fourth one.

Attorney-General: Was any other name proposed during your election?

Mirza Nasir: There is no such thing; no one can propose himself.

Attorney-General: Did someone else propose a name?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, two other names were proposed and they were both from my family. When I was elected, the other pledged allegiance to me.

Attorney-General: What is your concept of “Khalifa”?

Mirza Nasir: It is our belief that Khalifa is chosen by God – votes are casted by them (members of the election committee) but it is the will of God that is at work and God has influence over their minds and only he whom God wills will be the Khalifa. God’s hidden will is at work in this election. After election, he cannot be subjected to a “no-confidence” with votes. Whenever God wills, he can cause him (the Khalifa) to die.

Attorney-General: What is the position of a decision of the Khalifa?

Mirza Nasir: An order of the Khalifa is binding, but I do consult with others. I concur with any opinion of the majority.

Attorney-General: Can the Khalifa reject the majority opionion (of advisors)?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, of course.

Attorney-General: Can you be suspended?

Mirza Nasir: It is out of the question.

Attorney-General: When you are “Khalifatul Masih al-Thalith”, then why are you known as “Amir-ul-Mu’mineen”?

Mirza Nasir: Jama’ats outside (of Pakistan) are not used to (or cannot pronounce – translator) this term, so they say something like it; but officially it is “Khalifa”.

Attorney-General: And “Imam of the Jama’at”?

Mirza Nasir: The meaning of “Khalifatul Masih” is Imam of the Jama’at.

Attorney-General: If “Jama’at” refers to the Ahmadiyya, then are not others mu’mineen? (faithful, believers)?

Mirza Nasir: Now I understand. “Amir-ul-Mu’mineen” means the commander of those people who accept the claim of the one who claimed to be the Mahdi – those mu’mineen.

Attorney-General: That is, Amir of Ahmadiyya Jama’at?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, this is close (to the fact). There is no other meaning.

Attorney-General: He who is not in the Jama’at, is a mu’min? (believer, faithful)?

Mirza Nasir: This is a long discussion.

Attorney-General: How many of you are there?

Mirza Nasir: We do not keep records.

Attorney-General: Is your proselytizing activity only in Pakistan and India, or beyond that?

Mirza Nasir: We spread love and affection everywhere.

Attorney-General: How many are they who accepted your love and affection overseas?

Mirza Nasir: There is no record of how many.

Attorney-General: To someone who joins, do you give a form to fill out?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, the form of the pledge of allegiance.

Attorney-General: The number of such forms?

Mirza Nasir: There is no record kept.

Attorney-General: How many people became Ahmadis in the last 20 years?

Mirza Nasir: There is no record kept.

Attorney-General: There is no record of anyone who becomes a member?

Mirza Nasir: We do not keep such records.

Attorney-General: Any register?

Mirza Nasir: Not to my knowledge. Whether we count the forms to pledge allegiance, is also not in my knowledge.

Attorney-General: Have you ever been involved in politics?

Mirza Nasir: Never. We have never even thought about this.

Attorney-General: Has any of your members run for government office?

Mirza Nasir: Not at all; never even thought about it. As a jama’at (community), not in this country, nor in any country of the world, have we ever made anyone to run (for election).

Attorney-General: Is the “Khalifa” not the head-of-state in Islam?

Mirza Nasir: Huzur (Prophet Muhammad), peace be on him, and his “Khalifas” were indeed – in both the temporal and religious spheres. Worldly, religious and spiritual Imamat (leadership) was conjoined in their persons. After the advent of Mirza Sahib, his (Mirza Sahib’s) successors have spiritual Imamat (leadership) and this is our fundamental belief.

Attorney-General: That is, the Khalifa cannot even be the President or Prime Minister?

Mirza Nasir: No, nothing. We are not even interested in politics.

Attorney-General: OK, if there is a disagreement between the head-of-state and the Khalifa, then members of your Jama’at . . . . .

Mirza Nasir: This is a new question: if the law of the land and faith collide, what way should one choose? See, we are 10 million worldwide, and 3.5 to 4 million in Pakistan . .

Attorney-General: What was your membership at the time of the death of Mirza Qadiani?

Mirza Nasir: A few thousand maybe . . . (after consulting) … about 400,000 at that time. It is an estimate.

Attorney-General: What was the number in the 1901 census?

Mirza Nasir: Do not know.

Attorney-General: Something is wrong. In 1908, at the time of the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, your number was 19,000?

Mirza Nasir: In the census?

Attorney-General: This is a document published by the British foreign office in 1920 to serve as fact for the use of its offices . . . .

Mirza Nasir: That is their statement.

Attorney-General: It is a report of the British government. In any case, it is their certification that at the time, the number of this religious group is not more than 19,000 and then they were divided into two camps, and the number was decreasing.

Mirza Nasir: The information of the British government may have been wrong.

Attorney-General: Mirza Mahmud, in his book, “Ahmadiyyat and Islam”, published in 1959, wrote that : In 1908, the followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad could be counted in the hundreds of thousands.

Mirza Nasir: I said so, four hundred thousand.

Attorney-General: But according to the census report of 1908, you number 18,000

Mirza Nasir: OK, it is all right.

Attorney-General: Then in the 1921 census, the number is 30,000 and in 1930-31, the total number is 56,000. This last number has been admitted by your father, Mirza Bashir (sic) in Alfazl, 5 August 1934.

Mirza Nasir: He was exhorting the subscribers of the paper.

Attorney-General: And said, our number is 56,000 . . .

Mirza Nasir: Yes. I follow your reasoning. (understand)

Attorney-General: Now let us look at the Munir Report. In 1954, it shows your number as 200,000.

Mirza Nasir: In all of Pakistan?

Attorney-General: Yes, that is what he says. I think you completely ignored the census scheme and all of a sudden, jumped to 3.5 or 4 million.

Mirza Nasir: Census-takers are non-Muslims and show Muslims as being less in number.

Attorney-General: Not the census. I am talking about the Justice Munir Report – that your number in 1954 was 200,000. In a similar way, this number is also in the 1960 edition of the Encyclopedia of Islam.

Mirza Nasir: (published) from Lahore?

Attorney-General: No. From Holland.

Mirza Nasir: Which page has these statistics?

Attorney-General: Look at page 10. It says: according to the numbers provided by the Ahmadis (to the 1960 edition), their number at that time in the whole world, according to them, is 500,000. As such, there will be 200,000 in Pakistan, and this is what Justice Munir wrote.

Mirza Nasir: I do not know who gave these numbers.

Attorney-General: Munir wrote: “I have been told”.

Mirza Nasir: I do not know who told him.

Attorney-General: We can deduce that some interested party must have told him. Any way, the short story is that I can say that you do not number more than 200,000 in Pakistan, and you cannot contradict me with any document.

Mirza Nasir: But it is my estimate . . .

Attorney-General: But you cannot contradict me by documentary means. Or you can bring the register, but then it is feared that the secret will be out.

Mirza Nasir: No, but this will be when there is an accurate census.

Attorney-General: In other words, you too have your doubts after this discussion?

Mirza Nasir: A census will provide the right number.

Attorney-General: In other words, even you do not know the right number at this time and you admit your lack of knowledge. OK, you said in Friday Sermon on 21 June (1974) that “every person is free to pursue his or her faith. No power and no government can interfere in this exercise of this right, and it is the demand of Article 20 of the Constitution.” Have you said this?

Mirza Nasir: Yes, that was my speech. There is religious freedom and no one can interfere in it under Article 20.

Attorney-General: Not even the Assembly or the Government?

Mirza Nasir: No one.

Attorney-General: If a person lies to save his life, does Article 20 give him permission to continue lying? Is not right to lie to save one’s life?

Mirza Nasir: It is not right according to me.

Attorney-General: Very well, OK. Now, it is not right to lie; but when a man lies about which religion he belongs to, is it the meaning of Article 20 that he should continue to lie, because there is religious freedom?

Mirza Nasir: How do you know that he is lying?

Attorney-General: For example, let us say that I am the principal of a college. A Muslim, trying to take a seat reserved for minorities, shows himself as a non-Muslim. Now, according to you, everyone is entitled express his/her faith. So, if he lies, I should not do anything? OK, I ask you this: You have quoted parts of the Constitution related to religious freedom in your speech. I respectfully ask you: did you quote the whole article or did you forget to quote part of it?

Mirza Nasir: I left out the beginning of it which is already in every mind.

Attorney-General: Thank you. That part being?

Mirza Nasir: Conditional on legality and the principles of morality.

Attorney-General: Yes. Meaning that religious freedom is conditional on law, morality and public peace. Do you admit this?

Mirza Nasir: It is obvious. It is a given.

Attorney-General: Now, a man falsely states his religion to achieve wrong goals, can he be restricted or not?

Mirza Nasir: No one has the right to restrict religious freedom.

Chairman: Look, the answer should be according to the question, though the witness agrees with it or not. The answer and the question should be related. Please answer the attorney’s question.

Attorney-General: Sir, it is not about agreeing. There are thousands of people who mislead others in this world. Now, if they make false statements about their religion, will you restrict them or not?

Mirza Nasir: A swindler should be censured.

Chairman: An answer to the question is expected. The answer is not according to the question.

Attorney-General: The question is about what is shown (expression). A person deliberately lies for his own material gain, what is the opinion of the honourable witness in this matter? If you do not want to answer, it is your choice.

Mirza Nasir: I would not like such a person.

Attorney-General: But do you think that the government can restrict . . .

Mirza Nasir: I condemn the youth who falsifies documents.

Chairman: Leave it. The delegation is excused for 15 minutes. We will break. Please be back at 12:15.

(Delegation departs)

Chairman: Respected members, you saw everything. I am satisfied with the approach of the attorney-general.

Various Members: Yes, we are too.

Chairman: We are thankful, this should be recorded. It is expected that most of what we discuss and the issues are important. There are other items that are peripheral, and they will also be dealt with. I am a lawyer myself and I am very satisfied and I take it that this is your opinion too.

Various Members: Yes.

Chairman: Then, we will meet again at 12:15

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

By Bashir Ahmed

The prime objective of all Prophets of Allah has always been to establish the Unity and Oneness (Tauheed) of Allah and to strive for the establishment of His ‘Deen’. Among the foremost subject matters that are often greatly emphasised in the Holy Qur’an are Tauheed and the Day of Judgement. The Holy Qur’an gives us a concept of Allah Who is the Most High and Exalted in status – Who is The First and The Last, The Evident and The Immanent, The Most Merciful and The Prevailing. He is The Knower of all that is either hidden or visible and He is The Sovereign, The Irresistible and The Supreme. And surely it is He Who is The Creator of everything. He is The Most High Whose grasp is over all visions but no vision can ever grasp Him in this world [see 6:103]. And if all the trees on earth were pens and the ocean were ink, with seven oceans behind it to add to its supply, yet would not the words and attributes of Allah be exhausted [see 31:27]. He is The One – Exalted in status – Whose Glory is declared by the heavens and the earth and all beings therein.

After this brief introduction, let us examine what Tauheed is all about. Tauheed is not only to verbally confess the Unity and Oneness of Allah but also to accept Him as the sole Cherisher, Sustainer and the only God from the bottom of one’s heart – and to give precedence to His decrees over one’s desires – and to obey His teachings, brought to us by His Prophets, in an exacted manner as ordered by Him – and not to cause any insolence, disrespect or blasphemy against Allah with either one’s deeds or words.

Throughout the history of mankind various factions among the nations have been associating idolatrous beliefs and dictums toward Allah SWT, and thus by doing so, they have been blameworthy of the blasphemy against the Exalted Status of Allah. At times, these blasphemies were either idolatry acts and beliefs or blasphemous dictums otherwise – as an example, to say that Jesus (pbuh) is the son of Allah or that He has begotten a son or that angels are the daughters of Allah etc. These kinds of dictums, no matter how meaningless and absurd they are and might not have anything to do with the reality, are extremely abominable to Allah. To declare someone as Allah’s son is such a great blasphemy that if the heavens rupture and the earth splits open [upon this blasphemy] even then it is a lesser thing (see 19:88-92). Similarly, the dictum that angels are the daughters of Allah is a great blasphemy and there will soon be accountability on the Day of Judgement (see 17:40). Moreover, it is Allah’s verdict that if the blasphemous people do no desist from such dictums then the painful punishment will befall upon them (see 5:72-73). Therefore, the servants of Allah should never even say something according to their whims and fancies that are inconsistent with the Most Gracious Status of Allah and that may lead to the blasphemy, insolence and disbelief [of Allah].

With all the above discourse, let us see what Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani writes on pages 103-105 of his book “Kitab-ul-Bariyyah”:

“God entered my body.…….and in this condition I was saying that we want a new System and new Heaven and new Earth. Thus initially I created Heaven and Earth in a condensed form in which there was no system or differentiation, then according to God’s wish, I created a system and differentiation, and I was watching that I have the power to create this. Then I created the Asmaan-e-Duniya (Lowest Heaven) and said that ‘We have beautified the world’s heaven with lamps’. Then I said that now we will create human from the extract of earth.…….”

Just ponder a little that a person born of a mere drop of semen is daring to claim that in his vision he himself became Allah and then even created the heavens and the earth. Obviously, a person may claim whatever either verbally or in writings, or he may utter extreme nonsense, yet it would neither actually cause him to eventually become the God nor this would be credible to the world. But, this kind of blasphemous, sacrilegious and heretic dictum will most certainly invoke Allah’s wrath as evident from the Qur’an: [If any of them should say, "I am a god besides Him", such a one We should reward with Hell: thus do We reward those who do wrong] [21:29]

Regardless of what Mirza sahib actually meant while calling himself Allah, it is absolutely clear in the light of the Qur’an that he deservedly justified invoking of Allah’s wrath upon himself. The followers of Mirza sahib often try to hide his utterance of Divinity behind the curtains of Mysticism (Sufism). But to find excuses for sins is a greater sin itself. Firstly, it is wrong to ascertain the claims of a claimant of prophethood in the light of Mysticism (Sufism) and its philosophy. It would only be fair to judge the character, teachings and dictums of a claimant of prophethood according to the criterion of previous Prophets of Allah and the Noble Qur’an. It is as clear as the daylight that the cardinal principle of the teachings of all Prophets was to establish the Unity of Allah (Tauheed) and none of the true Prophets of Allah ever committed any such blasphemy. This makes it absolutely evident that Mirza sahib was entirely wrong in his claim of prophethood since he was guilty of repeated blasphemies against Allah – The Most High and Exalted. Another example [of blasphemy] at a different place is that Mirza sahib claimed that his status is like Allah’s son despite the fact that at various places Qur’an has sternly rejected such absurd and meaningless dictums, thoughts and beliefs. As mentioned earlier, to declare someone as Allah’s son or to present such an allegory is such a great blasphemy that if the heavens rupture and the earth splits open [upon this blasphemy] even then it is a lesser thing. But Mirza sahib, while plunging in his self-assumed ocean of magnificence, has repeatedly written those things in his whims and fancies that are utterly disrespectful to Allah’s Exalted Status.

In a bid to defend Mirza sahib’s sacrilegious writings, Ahmadis either take refuge in Sufism and spirituality or present extremely distorted translations of some Qur’anic verses. Those verses whose twisted translation is normally presented include “wa ma ramaita iz ramaita” [see 8:17] and the verses revealed on the occasion of “Bai’t-e-Rizwan” [see 48:10] – with which Ahmadis usually declare quite audaciously and shamelessly that [Nauz-Billah] Allah manifested Himself upon Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and personalised the Holy Prophet during “Ghazwa-e-Badar” and “Bai’t-e-Rizwan”. The Ahmadi explanation of these Qur’anic verses is bizarre, ludicrous and regrettable since Sahibul-Quran Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself and his companions never inferred those connotations that are presented by Ahmadis in defence of Mirza sahib’s writings. As regards Sufism, it might be sufficient at this stage to mention that most of the heretical beliefs and practices of Sufism cannot be proven from Qur’an and Ahadith. Moreover, one does not find strong and credible evidence against those dictums and traditions often attributed to famous Sufis that would firmly establish their association with them. Most of the dictums attributed to famous Sufis are actually found in those books that have not been authored by them. On the contrary, these books were actually written by others at much later stages after the deaths of those famous Sufis. Hence, the authenticity of such dictums is highly questionable in the first place, and secondly, even if those dictums are proven authentic then from religious point of view nothing is the ultimate argument (Hujjat) for us if it is in contradiction to the Qur’an and Hadith.

Since Sufism is a separate and contentious subject in itself, it is sufficient to mention here that the philosophy of Islamic Mysticism (Tasawwuf) has deep roots in the philosophical thoughts borrowed from the ancient Greek, Persian and Indian philosophers. When the books of philosophers from these countries were translated in the era of Abbasid Caliphate then the hypothesis that ‘God is present in everything’ was readily included in Islamic Mysticism (Tasawwuf). The borrowed philosophical thoughts and beliefs later on gave birth to those heterodox and heretical thoughts of Tasawwuf that ultimately resulted in the surfacing of “Fana Fillah” [to become inseparable from Allah] theory and some of the Sufis happened to utter words like “Ana-al-Haq” [I am God]. Nevertheless, all kind of heterodox and heretical thoughts and beliefs, whether associated with Sufis or Aulia-e-Karam or Mirza sahib, are equally deplorable and shall be liable for punishment on the Day of Judgement.

As regards Mirza sahib’s heretic writings, they deserve to be even more liable for scrutiny [in the light of the Qur’an and Ahadith] in view of his claim of prophethood. As evident from the given excerpt, he claimed to have himself become Allah in the vision and thus created the heavens and the earth. Mirza sahib’s claim of Divinity is not limited to the given excerpt only. He has even claimed “Kun fa Yakoon” in his so-called and fabricated revelations. But the most interesting part is that the same Mirza sahib, in spite of having claimed to become Allah and thus the creator of the heavens and the earth in his vision and the recipient of ‘Kun fa Yakoon’ type of revelations, failed miserably in his bid to marry his dream-woman. He passed away with his unfulfilled yearnings while completely losing his honour and dignity in the process.

In the end, I request all Ahmadi brothers and sisters to scrutinise Mirza sahib’s heterodox and heretic writings with a neutral mind and put them to the test of Qur’an and Sunnah and to supplicate to Allah to guide them to the righteous path. Aameen summa Aameen.

FacebookEmailPrintShare
Nov 242003
 

Article # 5: NEW books exposing DEBACHERY, ORGIES, PERVERT lIVES OF QADIANI KHALIFAS.
(By Rashid Jahangiri)
—————————————————————————————————————————————–

On my recent visit to Pakistan I was able to collect and buy some booklets and books, exposing the immoral lives of Qadiani Khalifas Mirza Mahmud Ahmad, Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Mirza Tahir Ahmad and other prominent Qadianis e.g. Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan etc.

(1)Booklets were provided to me by: Former Waqif-e-Zindghi and former Qadiani Jamaat member Malik Aziz Ur Rehman. He is REAL brother of famous Qadiani Mr. Malik Abdul Rehman Khadam Gujrati (Khalid-i-Ahmadiyyat), author of ‘Ahmadiyya Pocket Book’.

(2) Former Waqif-e-Zindghi and former Qadiani Jamaat member Chaudhry Ghulam Rasul from Chak 35 near Sargodha (alias Penteree sahib), about whom Qadianis in their publication ‘Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat’ volume 19 did public defamation of private citizen. He gave me the book SHEHAR-E-SADOOM (Translation: City of Sodomy) by Shafiq Mirza. This book is available in the book stores in Urdu Bazar, Lahore. Some religious Muslim leaders in Pakistan has contacted to Chaudhry Ghulam Rasul sahib, to file a law suit on his behalf against Mirza Tahir Ahmad and Qadiani Jamaat on his public defamation in their publication ‘Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat’ volume 19. He is thinking on what to do next in this regard. In the mean time he is also busy in writing a book to answer the allegations in the Qadiani publication about him.

(3) From the book stall in the departure lounge at Lahore airport, I bought book: QADIANIAT AUS BAZAR MEIN (Translation: Qadianiat in that bazaar) by Muhammad Mateen Khalid. This book gives detail about Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan in addition to details about the immoral life of Qadiani Khalifas II, III and IV and Mirza Nasir Ahmad son Mirza Luqman Ahmad whose affairs with his girlfriend and mother Dr. Tahira was well known among Qadianis. This book gives details about the homosexual behaviour of Ch. Zafar Ullah Khan too with another Qadiani, owner of Shezan Juices and Shahnawaz Motors.

(4) On the inside of the jacket of book mentioned in point 3, there is ad of another book: SABOOT HAZAR HEY (Translation: Proof is available) by Muhammad Mateen Khalid. This book ALSO contain details of Sexual Behaviour of Qadiani Higher Leaders.

(5) On the inside of the back cover of book mentioned in point 3, there is ad of third book: QADIANIAT SEY ISLAM TAK (Translation: From Qadianiat to Islam) by Muhammad Mateen Khalid. This book contains the details given by former Qadiani about the inside organizational misconducts and why they left the Qadiani faith. I was told there is book namely: SIASAT DANOON KEY MUASHKEY (Translation: Love Affairs of Politicians). I have been told, this book also gives details about sexual behaviour of Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan. I was not able to find this book in book stores in Islamabad.

Email address for the books mentioned in point 3, 4 and 5 is:
fateh_publishers@hotmail.com Address of publisher and places to get these books, given in the books is: Fateh Publishers, 8-A Yousaf Market, Ghazni Street, Urdu Bazar, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tel# 7232336 and 7352332
e-mail address: fateh_publishers@hotmail.com
Ilm-o-Irfan Publishers, 7C Mather Street, Lower Mall Road, Lahore, Pakistan. Tel# 7352332

In the light of so much literature published by general Muslims and available in book store in Pakistan exposing life of Qadiani Khalifas and their sons and daughters and other prominent Qadianis, I don’t know how Qadiani Khalifas can even dream of returning to Pakistan. I have belief that Qadianis jamaat days are over in Pakistan.

 

 

FacebookEmailPrintShare
© 2012 ahmedi.org Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha