An extensive research on the word Baghaya, with everything a person would need.

Mirza GAQ has used this word in various books:
Following is the index of one particular book, Roohani Khazain volume 16. Under the word ‘Baghaya’, there are three entries. The first entry says:
Baghaya i.e. Street women (Zanaan-e-Baazari) and the loss that they had caused to the country and generation, its narration:  pp: 429-432, p.438.

(Because jama’at has taken out the original book from www.alislam.org and replaced it with the book that no more has this index of Vol.16, I have decided to upload it myself. Not a big deal, download here

http://www.2shared.com/document/kaPgBuMg/rk-16-index.html)

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 
This is a part of series of research related to Isa AS, Yasu, Masih Moud and Yuz Asaf. The image below is to satisfy our Ahmadi friends that when Mirza Sahib said “Yasu” or “Isa” while abusing he meant the same person. Although, he wasn’t aware of the fact proven through documents that Yuz Asaf was a preacher of Sabi religion, dating earlier than Moses and Jesus.
FacebookEmailPrintShare
 
Alif Anaar…!

By Iftikhar Ahmad, Germany

According to the present definition of Ahmadiyya, the voice of Khalifa is the voice of Allah [which indirectly means that if Khalifa makes a mistake then it is not his mistake, it is Allah’s mistake (Nauzbillah)]. The Khalifa of the Jama’at, a claimant of divine guidance, who also claims a following of 200 million people, ought to have responsibilities as big as Himalayan Mountains. Every moment of his life must be very precious. He would be struggling to find time even to relax from important matters like welfare, preaching, training and reforms of millions of Ahmadis. This is the perception of the followers about the Khalifa. But what is actually happening is totally the opposite. Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

A research regarding Yuz Asaf, based on Alberuni’s studies and various other sources.

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 
Every time an Ahmadi sees what MGAQ said about Yasu of Bible and Isa AS they run away by saying that he was talking about Yasu not Isa AS. Specially when research was presented regarding what Mirza Sahib said about Isa AS in http://ahmedi.org/general/guns-aimed-at-isa-as

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

 Wording of The Divine Revelation?

By A.K. Shaikh
The commandment of Allah is: “Jihad (fighting in the cause of Allah) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing, which is actually good for you and that you like a thing, which is actually bad for you. Only Allah has the absolute knowledge but you do not know.” [2:216]

This commandment of Allah is obligatory on every Muslim and is valid for all times – just like none of the commandments of Prayer, Fasting, Hajj and Zakat (obligatory alms) are temporary. There are certain conditions, however, like Hajj will only be performed during the days of Hajj; fasting will be in Ramadan; prayers during prescribed timings and Jihad (Qitaal) [fighting by sword] when it becomes obligatory etc. Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

I would like to share with everyone what Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani, who claimed to be a a second coming of Isa AS, had to say about actual Isa AS. He had to knock him down to claim his superiority over the previous one and also defeat Atham no matter what he had to say.

This is from Rk.vol.19.pg.486 in notes at the bottom.

“because people knew that this person(Isa AS) is a drunker and this unethical character is not after divinity but has been like this since beginning therefore the claim of divinity is a bad result of being a drunker” 

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

I would share some goodies by MGAQ. Afterall Ruhani Khazain are not that Ruhani .This is from Zameemah Baraaheen-e-Ahmadiyya. Part-5. I would translate this according to my english skills, if you could come up with a better one please do.MGAQ is defining the feeling of humility and humbleness and what happens when a person cries in humility.

 

MGAQ goes on to say: and they think that we have met God. but that pleasure is just as if an adulterer has with an unlawful women….(PS. please note he’s defining here about what kind of humility people from bad community feel like people who worship idols and dance on music etc)... next para

“and another symbolic mutuality is of humility and sperm and that is when a Sperm enters in the private-part (vagina) of a wife or any other woman; so sperm’s entering into the vagina and when the ejaculation flowing is just like crying because result of humility is crying too and like this when ejaculation of sperm occurs uncontrolled sperm bursts out in a flow. Same great situation is when in humility when tears burst into a uncontrolled flow from eyes and as the pleasure of ejaculation is halaal kind of whereas a man contacts(rujoo’) his wife and sometimes haraam kind when a man contacts(rujoo’) an unlawful woman”……

I would really like to hear from our Ahmadi friends to give us an insight into this gem from Mirza Sahib. I dont know why MGAQ chose to symbolize a feeling of humility with intercourse but I am pretty sure that there were 1000 better ways of explaining humility and differentiating it with halal or haram humility than what we just came across.

 

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

by Rationalist

This article is an attempt to settle the confusion once and for all on this topic. Over the duration of my exodus from the ‘A’ I have engaged with many Ahmadis on the internet as they denied all statements wherein Mirza Ghulam Ahmad called us Kafir. They vehemently deny all of our accusations of Takfeer from the ‘A’. They act like as if Mirza Ghulam Ahmad never called us Kafir in any way shape or form. They act as if we are wrongfully accusing them of Takfeer on us. This article is intended to settle the debate once and for all.

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
 

This research works just like a mathematics formula, to prove Mirza G.A.Q sahib wrong in his prophecies for Pigott we will take  the case of Dowie. Because the prophecy was ALMOST same for both of them, we can prove one with the other. Eg, if a=b, b=c means a=c.

We will go through a thorough study of Mirza sahib vs. Pigott and Dowie. The reason is because the prophecy for both of them never got fulfilled and innocent Ahmadis have been kept under lies upon lies that both the prophecies were fulfilled, which in reality is completely opposite. Part1 will discuss Dr. Dowie, his death and Part2 will discuss Pigott, his death. Both part contains what the original sources say and what jama’at has told it’s followers.

Continue reading »

FacebookEmailPrintShare
© 2012 ahmedi.org Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha