An extensive research on the word Baghaya, with everything a person would need.
Mirza GAQ has used this word in various books:
Following is the index of one particular book, Roohani Khazain volume 16. Under the word ‘Baghaya’, there are three entries. The first entry says:
Baghaya i.e. Street women (Zanaan-e-Baazari) and the loss that they had caused to the country and generation, its narration: pp: 429-432, p.438.
(Because jama’at has taken out the original book from www.alislam.org and replaced it with the book that no more has this index of Vol.16, I have decided to upload it myself. Not a big deal, download here
http://www.2shared.com/document/kaPgBuMg/rk-16-index.html)
For example, in this book Mirza Ghulam has used this word in following instances:
Baghaaya: Zanaan-e-Faasiqa – Corrupt ladies. (Roohani Khazain vol.16 p.426)Baghaaya alsouq: Zanaan-e-Bazaari – Street women. (ibid p.427)Baghiya: Zan-e-Faahishaa – Immoral women. (ibid p.428)
Baghaaya: Zanaan-e-Bazaari (ibid p.428)
Baghaaya: Zanaan-e-Faahisha (ibid p.429)
Yousaf Ahmed
Latest posts by Yousaf Ahmed (see all)
- Inhiraf: Documentary on Ahmadiyyah Awareness - July 26, 2014
- An Other Ahmadi Basharat Ahmad Quit Qadianiyat - February 27, 2014
- Debate: Sunni & Ahmadis, brother in faith? - December 24, 2013
48 Comments on "Mirza Ghulam Ahmed and Baghaya"
You nailed it bro. Ahmadis have been covering up the errors of their master for 100 years.
In fact, the entire concept of Ruhani Khuzain was an attempt by Ahmadi leaders at mixing up references. With the creation of RK, Ahmadis cant find the references that Muslims referred to 50+ years.
Isn’t it a shame that the Ahmadiyya cult has been reduced to one lie after another. They now seem to be spending more time trying to defend lies of their cult than solving real problems, this is just one such example.
-Naveed
I have uncovered new research from Van Der Linden wherein he writes that MGA plagurized Lekh Ram’s curses towards the narrative of Jesus Christ (as) in the bible. MGA appears to have stole the arguments from the Arya Samaj as he went on his tirade against Christianity.
I am glad that you have actually agreed that yes it does mean prostitute and whatever has been said has been said as it is. Baghi also means deprived of iman but it also means prostitute. Mirza Sahib has used it in both senses and this is good that you accepted it. No matter who he used it for do you think any prophet will use such language for his opponents.
Yes..the Quran hasnt been changed. However, your people are putting twists and turns on it regularly.
Furthermore, I am pointing out the fact that it was Ahmadis (lahoris) who accused Ahmadis of sex crimes and illicit behavior. They were the ones who took the lead in anti-Ahmadiyya polemics.
We are only supplementing their work.
Get the picture?
Why are you bringing up the Shias? You didnt even make a point in your statement. Can you be clearer as to what you are referring to??
Ahmadis have been covering up the errors of Mirza for 100 years. Its very sad.
This is the link from alislam . org, page 438 and Mirza translated baghaya as ” zanan fahisha” or slut in todays language.
I wrote this a few years ago….enjoy:
http://thecult.info/blog/2010/02/24/new-tadhkirah-vs-the-old-they-play-games-with-books/
This page and no sign of the index in the new version. I will prove it!
AHMADIYYAT ZINDABAD!
http://www.2shared.com/document/kaPgBuMg/rk-16-index.html
http://www.2shared.com/document/kaPgBuMg/rk-16-index.html
I had the original book, download it, you’ll find it on page 17.
Thanks, spread the light. bless you
http://www.2shared.com/document/kaPgBuMg/rk-16-index.html
yeh lain
read the older version of the book and show it to your friends again if you are truthful.